The purpose of the lesson is to enable students to fully understand and apply fundamental methods of testing water quality. This will include the collection, display, and interpretation of student data. Learners will understand that they are stewards of our water system and act responsibly for the common good.
Instructors Notes: This lesson may be presented using an on-site water testing experiential lesson or an in- class water quality testing class session. Both require safety equipment which must be obtained and at hand before the experiments. The teacher needs to demonstrate the use of goggles, gloves if necessary, and the testing equipment. The instructor should model recording the data as well as use of the equipment. Your local school should have access to pH test kits. If not, there are many sources such as www.hydroponics.net to obtain the test kits.
Three to Four Forty-Five Minute Class Periods
On-site water quality testing option will require obtained permission from local school or district and additional scheduled release time.
The learners will:
- identify five characteristics of a healthy river.
- measure the dissolved temperature, pH, and diversity of macroinvertebrates in local rivers.
- record his/her data on a table and display the findings graphically.
- demonstrate knowledge of the term "Commons" as it relates to water.
Commons (n) Resources which are not owned, either privately or by the state, but are left open for free use by all comers Stewardship (n) To help and protect, through giving of his/her time, talent or treasure, the water systems for the future.
- write a report stating a position relative to water quality, defending it with data and making the connection to stewardship.
The learner will collect environmental indicators to determine the quality of a local stream.
Anticipatory Set:
Fill a clean beaker with water. Put orange and green food coloring in water to make it appear dirty. Tell your students that you just got this water from the dirtiest local body of water. Ask your class why they think the water is so discolored. After some discussion on the filth of the water dramatically drink it! After their reaction, explain that all the water we drink comes from bodies of water that are polluted and it is essential for our survival to have clean water.
Expanding the Anticipatory Set: Show VHS formatted, Video of the Hudson River Project Outside Television: The Hudson Riverkeepers (1998) ASIN: 6305835411.
Showing this video will make that connection between the science content and philanthropy, acting as stewards of our water system.Instructor's Note: All student work should be put into a personal portfolio to be handed in at the end of the lab. Rough draft of the essay and all reflection activities are to be kept in this portfolio.
Strategy One: Determine the on-site location, secure transportation, release time and authority, and obtain parental permission and volunteers to accompany your class. Provide safety goggles, gloves and boots if necessary, test kits and perform the four required tests. Model the behaviors expected of the students.
Strategy Two: Obtain many samples of river or stream water sufficient for successful completion of all four tests and allow students to perform these tests within the class. It is suggested that a large aquarium full of river or stream water would suffice.
| Philanthropy |
(n) 1. The giving of one's time, talent or treasure for the sake of another- or for the common good - Robert Payton, 2. Voluntary action for the public good -Robert Payton, 3. Voluntary giving, voluntary service, and voluntary association, primarily for the benefit of others - Robert Payton, 4. Giving and serving -Richard J. Bentley and Luana G. Nissan, 5. Active effort to promote human welfare, 6. A tradition, a spirit, and a sector of society - Maurice G. Gurin and Jon Van Til |
Directions: In our reading and experiments we discovered many things. React to the following statement and give supportive data, definitions, identifications and reasons. Use as many facts as you can. Connect your answer to what we learned about stewardship.
In our water quality testing we found that there are too few macroinvertebrates. This is detrimental/not detrimental to our lake or river because…
Reflection Activities: To be placed in their portfolios.
Pre experience: Write their expected outcomes of the experiments. What do they think they will find?
During the experiment: Evaluate the experience and their feelings of the obvious things they discover such as pop cans and other litter.
Post experience: Propose projects as Service-Learning opportunities.
|
Points |
Scientific Content/ELA |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Lesson Developed and Piloted by:
Peter McWain| I discussed these questions with my: _____________________________ |
|
(name and relation)
|
Macroinvertebrate Diversity: Indicator of Water Quality
Greater diversity of organisms in a community indicates a healthier, more stable environment. Organisms that have a high sensitivity to water quality will die off in polluted water.
Collecting Macroinvertebrates
There are many ways to collect macroinvertebrates. You may use a variety of nets (kick net, dip net).
Test One
Collect 50 macroinvertebrates and sort them into like Taxa groups. Use the formula below to determine the quality of the water. Note that the Taxa groups will indicate their tolerance to pollution. The Taxa group with the most organisms is most tolerable to pollution. The Taxa group with the least organisms is the least tolerable to pollution.
| Group 1 - Two different Taxa found, |
2 x 1 = 2 (score) |
| Group 2 - Five different Taxa found, |
5 x 2 = 10 (score)
|
| Group 3 - Four different Taxa found, |
4 x 3 = 12 (score)
|
| Group 4 - Two different Taxa found, |
2 x 4 = 8 (score)
|
| Different Taxa = 13 | Total Group Score = 32 |
Formula:
{Total Group Score (32) }/{Number of different Taxa(13)} = 2.46 (Pollution Index)
Water Quality Rating
| 1.0 - 2.0 | Excellent Water Quality |
| 2.1 - 2.5 | Good Water Quality |
| 2.6 - 3.5 | Fair Water Quality |
Test Two
The Sequential Comparison Index (SCI) is based on the theory of runs. A new run begins each time an organism picked from the sample looks different than the one picked just before it.
SCI = (number of runs)/(total number of organisms picked)
Water Quality Rating
| 0.0 - 0.3 | Poor |
| 0.3 - 0.6 | Fair |
| 0.6 - 1.0 | Good |
What is a run? Pick the organisms randomly from your sample and place them in a separate container. Your partner should compare each organism with the previous organism and record either an x or o. If the organism is the same as the previous, record the same symbol. If different, use a different symbol. Even if you have two different mayflies, they could be different mayflies and should have different symbols.
Keep your samples for your next test.
| Example: | Total Runs = 8 |
| Total Organisms = 17 | |
| SCI = 8/17 = .47 | |
| Water Quality = Fair |
Test Three
Diversity Index (DI )
You need to determine the Taxa Richness of your sample population. To do this you must count the number of different Taxa. Multiply the Taxa Richness by the SCI value.
Formula:
DI = SCI x Taxa Richness
Water Quality Rating
| 0-8 | Poor |
| 9-12 | Fair |
| 12-24 | Good |
Test Four
pH
pH measures the H+ ion concentration of liquids and substances. The pH scale ranges from
0-14. Pure deionized water contains equal numbers of H+ and OH- ions and has a pH value of 7. If the sample has more OH- ions it is considered basic and has a higher value than 7. If the sample has more H+ ions than the sample it is considered acidic and has a lower value than 7. A change in the pH of a river may result in the death of species in that river.
Example pH levels of household supplies
| Household Supplies | pH |
| Battery Acid | 1 |
| Lemon Juice | 2 |
| Vinegar | 3 |
| Cola | 4 |
| Normal Rain | 5.6 |
| Distilled Water | 7 |
| Baking Soda | 8.2 |
| Ammonia | 11 |
| Bleach | 12 |
PH Testing Procedure
| Involvement in an accurate presentation | 10 points |
| Participation in sample collecting | 15 points |
| Neat personal data | 15 points |
| Accurate results | 10 points |
| Compiled class data graphs | 20 points |
| Accurate average data values | 10 points |
| Short lab report stating the health of the river with your position backed up with data values for every test performed. |
20 points |
| Total Points | 100 |
Grading Scale
| 100-90 | A |
| 90-80 | B |
| 80-70 | C |
| 70-60 | D |
| 60-0 | F |
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to freely use this information for nonprofit (noncommercial), educational purposes only. Copyright must be acknowledged on all copies.