Community capital has been defined as the "banked good will that helps build trust between various groups within a community."1 Community capital is also frequently called "social capital." Social capital is also commonly referred to as "the networks, norms and trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit" (Putnam 2000, 19). It is an important component of a strong civil society. "Where social capital exists, people can come together to understand what needs to be done and work to accomplish needed tasks" (Van Til 2000, 5). Community capital is, then, a public good, a good that private markets alone can not provide. Therefore, it is in the third sector, made up of nonprofits and voluntary associations, where social capital is built.
L.J. Hanifan made the first documented use of the term social capital in 1916. Hanifan, a reformer during the Progressive Era, defined social capital as "good will, fellowship, sympathy and social intercourse" (Putnam 2000, 19). Hanifan believed that social capital benefited the community as a whole as well as the individual who received "help, sympathy, and the fellowship of his neighbors" (Ibid.). Though the term was coined by Hanifan, it seemed destined to be lost to history.
However, in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s the term re-emerged. People in a variety of different professions found the term compelling. Social capital found its way into the writings of urbanist Jane Jacobs, economists Glen Lowery and Ekkehart Schlicht, social theorist Pierre Bourdieu, and renowned sociologist James Coleman. Yet, it was Robert Putnam, a political scientist and Harvard professor, who has done the most to focus modern-day attention on it.
Putnam´s highly successful book Bowling Alone ensured that the term social capital not only showed up in the lexicon of academics, but among people in international development, within foundations, and even at the White House when President Clinton incorporated concepts into his speeches.
In Making Democracy Work (1993), Robert Putnam and his colleagues studied Italy and compared the development of their regional governments. In the1970s, Italy had established twenty regional governments, virtually identical in form. Putnam found wide variations based on the social, economic, political and cultural contexts of the region. He discovered that some of the regional governments were "dismal failures... inefficient, lethargic and corrupt" (Putnam "The Prosperous Community" 1993). Yet other governments were highly successful, able to manage the public´s business efficiently and satisfy their constituents.
Regions with successful governments, Putnam found, were the ones with strong traditions of civic engagement. Putnam noted that it was the level of "voter turnout, newspaper readership, membership in choral societies and literacy circles, Lions clubs, and soccer clubs" were indicators of whether a region was successful" a place where democracy worked (Ibid.).
According to Putnam, "working together is easier in a community blessed with a substantial stock of social capital" (Ibid.). Putnam lists a number of reasons why this is so.
In the first place, networks of civic engagement foster sturdy norms of generalized reciprocity and encourage the emergence of social trust. Such networks facilitate coordination and communication, amplify reputations, and thus allow dilemmas of collective action to be resolved. When economic and political negotiation is embedded in dense networks of social interaction, incentives for opportunism are reduced. At the same time, networks of civic engagement embody past success at collaboration, which can serve as a cultural template for future collaboration. Finally, dense networks of interaction probably broaden the participants´ sense of self, developing the "I" into the "we," or (in the language of the rational-choice theorists) enhancing the participants "taste" for collective benefits. (Putnam 1995)
Ties to the Philanthropic Sector
The core question of Making Democracy Work "why do some regions of the world thrive and others lag behind“ is a central concern of international development organizations like the World Bank as well. This shared concern has led many international development organizations and foundations in the United States, concerned about development and chronic social ills (like poverty), to take a close look at the concept of social capital. The World Bank notes there is increasing evidence that social capital is "critical for poverty alleviation and sustainable human and economic development" (The World Bank Group 2003).
Among foundations there has been an increased interest in finding ways to build social capital and support the development of civic leadership and engagement through "civil investment." An article written by Kathryn Merchant, president and chief executive officer of The Greater Cincinnati Foundation, described the strategies she felt foundations could undertake to build social capital. They included grant making, supporting community foundations, creating strategic initiatives, serving as liaisons between diverse groups of people, and addressing public policy.
Recently, thirty-six community foundations around the United States participated in a nationwide survey of social capital. Four of these were Michigan community foundations, including the Fremont Area Community Foundation, the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan, the Kalamazoo Community Foundation, and the Grand Rapids Community Foundation. Community foundations were considered natural partners for the project because of their work bringing together different community groups to try to identify and solve local issues which, in turn, builds social capital.
Among nonprofit organizations interested in increasing the opportunities for citizen participation in civic life, a new community-building paradigm is being built which views people as "assets rather than problems, and results are measured by increases in capacity for collective action rather than program outcomes" (Merchant 1998).
Key Related Ideas
Civil Society Most often associated with the third sector, civil society is a term whose "meaning and implications remain difficult to grasp" (Van Til 2000, 14). Former Senator Bill Bradley described civil society as the "third leg" of a societal stool where government and the marketplace are seen as the other two legs. Policy analyst Don Eberly (2000) defines civil society as something beyond simply associational (not created only by participation) but it must include shared values and beliefs.
Civil society can probably best be understood by what it contains within it: "the most vital and intimate institutions that socialize infants into adults and transform private individuals into public-spirited citizens" (Ibid., 4). Civil society is "public in nature, though not governmental" and provides the public space "where people learn through practice such essential democratic habits as trust, collaboration, and compromise" (Ibid.).
Communitarianism "Exhibiting a link between the two concepts," Eberly reflects, "while civil society theorists focus more generally on the vast non-governmental sector consisting predominately of voluntary associations and such social institutions as the family and neighborhood, the communitarians are interested in the idea of the community" (2000, 16). The definition of community is similar to the definition of civil society, but linked more to its geography. Community members are tied together by ethnicity, religion, or simply by residency. Communitarians seek to encourage greater social cohesion and develop a greater balance between rights and responsibilities. Sociologist Amitai Etzioni has been the key proponent of communitarianism through his advocacy, numerous writings, and annual convening of scholars and practitioners from the three sectors.
Third Sector Also called the nonprofit sector or philanthropic sector, this is that vast network of persons and groups engaged in service, philanthropy and participation. In this sector, social capital is created.
Important People Related to the Topic
James Coleman - A University of Chicago sociologist who wrote the seminal work Foundations of Social Theory. Coleman studied the reasons for the comparatively low dropout rates in area Catholic high schools versus area public schools. He hypothesized that the school´s success was based on the social structure of the school that included multi-stranded relationships between parents, school, students and the church.
Amitai Etzioni - A sociologist and founder of communitarianism. In 1993, Etzioni developed the Responsive Communitarian Platform which includes these three key components:
- A communitarian perspective recognizes both individual human dignity and the social dimension of human existence.
- A communitarian perspective recognizes that the preservation of individual liberty depends on the active maintenance of the institutions of civil society.
- A communitarian perspective recognizes that communities and polities, too, have obligations, including the duty to be responsive to their members and to foster participation and deliberation in social and political life.(Van Til 2000, 8)
Francis Fukuyama - The author of Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Fukuyama examined the role that trust and collaboration play in enabling individuals to compete in a rapidly changing and interconnected global marketplace. According to Fukuyama, economic life is maintained by "moral bonds of social trust, an unspoken, unwritten bond between fellow citizens that facilitates transactions, empowers individual creativity, and justifies collective action" (Eberly 2000, 18).
Alexis de Tocqueville "Described as the forefather of civil society, Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political theorist who visited the United States to study the American prison system in the early 1800s. During his visit, Tocqueville became fascinated with America´s voluntary associations. In his book Democracy in America, published in 1835, he noted "nothing was more deserving of attention than these associations that dotted the United States´ unique civic landscape. They were indispensable to the functioning of American democracy" (Ibid., 7).
Important Related Nonprofit Organizations
The Saguaro Seminar of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, with the help of three dozen community foundations and a number of funders, conducted the largest survey of social capital in America.
The World Bank Group is an international development organization that provided more than $19.5 billion in loans to developing countries in 2002. Poverty Net, located on the World Bank´s Web site, contains an extensive library of online articles and abstracts on social capital
- Cohen, Don and Laurence Prusak. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001. ISBN 0-87584-913-X.
- Eberly, Don E. The Essential Civil Society Reader: The Classic Essays. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. ISBN 0-8476-9718-5.
- Etzioni, Amitai, ed. New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions and Communities. Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 1995. ISBN 0-8139-1569-4.
- Merchant, Kathryn. "Foundations Develop Social Capital." PovertyNet Library (1 January 1998). The World Bank Group.
- Putnam, Robert D. "Bowling Alone: America´s Declining Social Capital: An Interview with Robert Putnam," Journal of Democracy 6 (January 1995):1.
- Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. ISBN 0-684-83283.
- Putnam, Robert D. "The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life," The American Prospect 4 (21 March 1993): 13.
- Putnam, Robert D., with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Y. Nanetti. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. ISBN 0-691-03738-8.
- Van Til, Jon. Growing Civil Society: From NonProfit Sector to Third Space. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2000. ISBN 0-253-33715-1.
- The World Bank Group. Social Capital for Development.
This paper was developed by a student taking a Philanthropic Studies course taught at Case Western Reserve University. It is offered by Learning To Give and Case Western Reserve University.